Home · Results

Evidence

Reference comparison on five multiplexed qubits

Frozen evidence under one protocol: assignment quality, analytical fabric cost, and per-qubit behavior. System-level endings — logical error and NISQ operating points — live on the goals page.

Accuracy vs fabric cost

Each point is one method under the shared five-transmon protocol. Higher is better joint assignment accuracy; left is lower estimated LUT cost.

Filter-based methods cluster toward cheaper fabric. Neural and hybrid methods trade cost for accuracy. Use the goals page to turn this ranking into LER or a NISQ operating point.

FTQC and NISQ goals →

Reference comparison
Accuracy versus fabric cost

Marker size scales with estimated latency.

Per-qubit fidelity heatmap
Per-qubit fidelity heatmap

Joint accuracy can hide a weak multiplexed channel.

Interactive · accuracy vs cost

Hover for method, accuracy, and estimated LUT.

Reference table

Turn numbers into a goal

Assignment quality is an input. Logical error, idle exposure, and cycle time — or a NISQ accuracy–latency knee — are the endings.

FTQC and NISQ goals