Home · Learn

Foundations

Readout turns a quantum state into a classical decision

Measurement mistakes are not abstract: they become wrong labels. This page walks from the microwave probe to the three error channels that matter, then to why NISQ and FTQC care about different endings.

Dispersive readout in brief

In circuit QED, a superconducting qubit is coupled to a resonator. A microwave probe reflects with a state-dependent phase and amplitude. Electronics record a short I/Q time series; a discriminator turns that series into a label.

From probe to label
Dispersive readout pipeline

The IQ trace is the evidence. Assignment error starts here.

Raw IQ shots
IQ scatter without state highlights

All shots in the IQ plane — no state labels.

With |0⟩ / |1⟩ blobs
IQ scatter with ground and excited highlights

Colored by true state; red points are nearest-centroid assignment errors.

Five-transmon multiplexed readout: overlap between clouds is the classifier’s problem.

Three error channels

Relaxation, excitation, and leakage leave different fingerprints on the trajectory. Integration time trades accuracy for idle exposure — which is why NISQ and FTQC optimize different endings.

Relaxation · excitation · leakage
Three readout error channels

Relaxation

Decay during acquire

An excited qubit decays while the probe integrates, so the path looks partly ground-like and binary cuts misfire.

Excitation

Spurious promotion

Noise or heat pushes |0⟩ toward |1⟩, creating false positives that look like gate failures downstream.

Leakage

Leaving {|0⟩,|1⟩}

Higher levels form a third cluster. Binary models fold leakage into two-level error; multi-level methods label it explicitly.

Two system endings

NISQ · accuracy vs latency

On noisy intermediate-scale processors, choose an operating point under your coherence budget. Higher accuracy usually costs more inference latency.

Filter-only and compact hybrid methods cluster toward the low-latency side; heavier networks sit farther right when fabric estimates grow.

NISQ operating view
Accuracy versus latency

Reference methods under the shared protocol.

FTQC · logical error vs duration

With physical noise held fixed (no idle scaling), longer integration improves assignment and therefore lowers logical error rate across the full acquire window.

When idle scaling is enabled instead, shorter readout can win — that alternate ending lives on the FTQC goals page.

LER vs duration
Logical error versus duration

Fixed p_phys · full window to 2000 ns · legend outside the axes.

Continue